Prostitution in a post-feminist society

        Prostitution in a post-feminist society

At the moment the laws on prostitution are crazy and totally unfair to Men. It’s crazy that gentlemen should have to pay a whore to use her body and that she should then be able to live off the proceeds of that. It’s even more unfair that a gentleman can be arrested and punished just for doing that. I mean, how crazy is it that a whore is willing to sell her body for money and yet he gets punished just for giving the girl what she wants?

      So what’s the best solution? IMO, the post-feminist society will institute such radical changes in sexual relations that prostitution in future will be pretty much a specialist market mainly for rich gentlemen.

      In terms of the law, it should still be IMO a criminal offence for a girl to solicit men for sex; after all, that’s her trying to get money out of gentlemen for something that she ought to be giving them for nothing! I reckon it should also still be an offence for a girl to earn money out of selling her body because otherwise she’s living off immoral earnings and we can’t have her doing that, can we?.So if she tries to make money out of selling her body that makes her a whore and whoring should still be a crime.  

      So how should we regulate the limited amount of prostitution that will remain for rich, specialist clients? The most obvious solution is to grant licenses to gentlemen, organisations run by gentlemen or possibly the local authorities to operate brothels. In these places the girls will be subject to the authority of the owner and management of the brothel, who obviously can only be men. They will hire out the girl for gentlemen to use and they will take all the profits of the transaction between the gentlemen wishing to buy and those offering the girl’s services.  That would mean that the girl could still be fucked or used sexually by the gentlemen in any way they wanted as long as they’d agreed on it beforehand with the brothel or the girl’s legal owner. A gentleman who wanted to pay to use a whore for more specialist services could still do so but she wouldn’t be able to live off immoral earnings any more since the fee to use her services would, quite rightly, be paid by the gentlemen to the brothel management or the girl’s legal owner instead of to the whore herself. A win-win all round; the sex goes on, the money changes hands but this time not a penny of it goes into the girl’s pocket! She’d still be a whore but the law would classify her as a “voluntary whore” rather than as a “whore for money.”

      I think it would also be a good idea (I’ll write more about it when I post on education) if whores went into schools to give sex education classes to the students. They’d be able to make sex education really come alive and give the youngsters the benefit of all their experience so they’d be able to enjoy the full range of sexual activities from an early age through direct hands-on experience!

      Obviously the girls would have to be checked out by doctors on a daily basis to make sure they’re clean.  After all, we wouldn’t want the whores passing on any of their nasty sexually transmitted diseases to their gentlemen customers, would we?

So how exactly would prostitution be regulated in a post-feminist society? In the first place it would be a legal requirement for the girl to be registered with the local authority and a central database as a “voluntary whore.” Her legal owner or the management of the brothel would sign a legally binding document in which they give a clear undertaking that under no circumstances will the girl receive a penny for any services that she offers to her gentlemen customers, all the money she makes going directly to the brothel or to her legal owner.

She is not even allowed to accept gifts like a meal, a box of chocolates or even a bunch of flowers. Only her owners may profit financially from her whoring. They also promise to pay 1% of the income from her services to the government in tax. She will have no say in what the customers want to do to her and no right to refuse to let them do anything they want as long as the management of the brothel or her legal owner have first agreed the transaction between them.

The girls would be given “performance ratings” by the customers and those who got high scores would be rewarded while the ones with low scores would be punished. If a gentleman complains about a whore only his word will be taken and of course the girl will be punished for failing to give him satisfaction. Anything goes with a voluntary whore and she’s not allowed to refuse any demand or to complain about her treatment.

I could say a lot more about this but it’ll do for starters, right?

Do we need prisons for females?

Do we need prisons for females?

This is an interesting question that was raised by a member of my message board and which drew some interesting responses. I’ve been giving the whole thing a lot of thought ever since.

In the first place, I guess I need to make it clear that most of the current problems with female crime are directly the fault of the way that feminism has brainwashed and distorted women’s views of the world as it is and the way it should be.

I look forward with a lot of hope to a post-feminist world in which the madness that these women inflicted upon all of us is nothing more than a distant nightmare like Nazism.

In the meantime I’d like to look at it from two different angles. One is that right now we certainly DO seem to need prisons to hold dangerous females. The other is more arguable.

Basically I guess the question is would we still need prisons for females in a post-feminist society, especially if it was based on masculist principles rather than just abolishing the worst abuses and excesses of feminism?

My answer is a qualified, yes. In the first place, during the transitional period when females are being re-educated to understand that feminism was an evil lie and that the true role of a girl is to serve men the best way she can, we’ll still need ways to punish female criminals.

Secondly, even once a masculist new world order is firmly established, I think it would be naïve to think that you’re not still going to get girls who do bad things.

OK, there are other ways of punishing them besides prison, agreed. In the first place we need to have the death penalty back in place though of course only girls would be subject to it. Second, the extensive use of judicial flogging, public punishments in the stocks, pillory, ducking stool, scold’s bridle and stuff like that would take care of most of the petty crime without needing to send the girls to prison. Thirdly, the new reforms in family law and the status of girls generally will decriminalise many acts for which men were previously unjustly imprisoned. The most important of these new legal reforms are the legalisation of all types of rape except “stranger rape” and the reclassification of the crime of “domestic violence” as the new legal right of “domestic discipline.” Finally, girls can be sentenced to hard labour in public places rather than sending them to prison.

All these are good and necessary measures but even so I still see a place for prison as a way of punishing bad girls. I’ll give you my reasons.

First off, what about all the men who were unjustly convicted of rape or domestic violence under the bad old feminist laws? OK, they’ll all be released from prison and get monetary compensation for their ordeal. Even so, wouldn’t it be fair for their false accusers to be sent to prison themselves and the men they’d wronged to be put in charge of them as prison guards?

Second, hard labour only really works if it’s done on the basis of the criminal being based in a secure prison unit and led out each day to carry out their work duties.

Thirdly, what about all the girls who are too old, ugly or whatever to be much use to gentlemen in terms of pleasing them sexually? Shouldn’t they be sent to prison so they can be punished and made to work their arses off there?

I guess it goes without saying that prisons under the new post-feminist society would be totally different from the way they are now. Here’s how I see the way that prisons for girls should be in the future. Of course I’ve got lots of other ideas as well but these will do for starters.

1                     All females have no “rights” but female prisoners have even less of them.

2                     All guards in female prisons would be male and preferably recruited from men who’ve been wrongly convicted of rape or domestic violence offences under feminism.

3                     They would have an absolute license to fuck any of the girls under their control without worrying about the law. It would be LEGAL for them to “rape” the female prisoners. (In fact, to encourage recruitment, it could be advertised as one of the “perks” of the job.)

4                     They’d also have an absolute license to use whatever means they liked to control, subdue, punish or discipline the girls in their charge, up to and including deadly force.

5                     Girls held in prison would be naked and held in strict restraint 24/7.

6                     Hard labour for girls would be an automatic and integral part of a prison sentence.

7                     All girls in prison would receive a daily “maintenance” flogging in addition to any other punishments they might be liable to for any bad behaviour.

8                     Female prisoners are absolutely forbidden to complain about their treatment on pain of even more severe punishment.

9                     Any complaint by a guard about a female prisoner will automatically be upheld no matter what the evidence might be.  She will ALWAYS be found guilty of the charges.

10                 There will be NO parole for female inmates. Any girl sentenced to prison must serve at least her full sentence as ordered by the court. NO exceptions are allowed.

11                 A girl sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment can have it increased by a day for every violation of the prison rules she’s found guilty of, up to a possible maximum of double the girl’s original sentence. (I suspect that in practice almost all girls will serve double whatever sentence they originally got handed down by the court!)

12                 Girls in prison would be fed only the most basic rations. Dry bread and water, porridge made with water instead of milk, cereal with water instead of milk, salad and (since the prisoners will be carrying out very hard physical labour) the following substitutes for “dog food” to help them keep their strength up but with the food still being as disgusting as possible) – a) bitch broth – take a can of beef or chicken, a box of cereal and a carton of gravy. Heat the meat and drain off the water. Add the same amount of cereal as there is meat in the can. Then stir till it’s all blended into a gooey mush, stir in the gravy to make it wet, let it cool to room temperature and serve; b) cunt stew – cook the canned meat, let it cool down in the fridge in a plastic container. Serve cold with mashed potatoes and raw cabbage. To get the maximum effect out of these dishes I recommend serving them to the girls in dog bowls. Disgusting all round but a great way to add to make the girl’s life in prison even more miserable than it already is!

13                 A girls’ day in prison starts with her being woken at 5 o’clock in the morning and dragged out of her cell to carry out her bodily functions. She’ll be ordered to piss and/or shit in full view of the guard into the potty provided in her cell, the only form of toilet facilities she’ll be allowed in prison. Then she has to go to the shower block. Her restraints will be removed so she can shower but there will be no doors on the shower, CCTV will be fitted to the shower cubicle as it will be inside her cell, and she will have to shower in full and constant view of the male guards. Then the girl will be put back into restraints, fucked or otherwise used by the guards for their pleasure, led out to roll call where the governor of the prison will check off the girls against his list and then they’ll be allowed to eat their breakfast before being sent off to work. Any punishments the girl’s earned the previous day will be administered before she goes off to work.

14                 Work in prison won’t be anything cushy like it has been in the past. Hard labour under the new rules will make Sheriff Joe’s methods look positively liberal and soft. Girls will have to carry out strenuous physical labour, doing all the dangerous and unpleasant jobs that men used to have to do. Now female prisoners can be sent out to carry out heavy lifting, heavy hauling, construction work, mining, forestry, rat-catching, sewage work, digging ditches, that sort of thing. Their labour will be farmed out by the prison to local employer who’ll pay the institution for using them to carry out the work. The girls, of course, won’t be paid a penny for their labour but it will help to make the prison an entirely self-supporting institution rather than a drain on the taxpayer. That way the girls actually end up paying indirectly for the cost of their own imprisonment and carrying out hard manual labour! How it should be, right?

15                 The working day for a female inmate will start at 6 o’clock in the morning and won’t end until around 10 o’clock at night. Of course compulsory overtime can always be imposed on the girls if necessary! The girls will be allowed a five minute break at 7.30 a.m., a ten-minute break at 9 a.m., another five minute break at 10.30 a.m. a half-hour break for lunch at 12 o’clock, another five minute break at 1.30 p.m., another ten minute one at 3 o’clock, another five minute break at 4.30 p.m., a fifteen-minute refreshment break at 6 o’clock, a five-minute break at 7.30- p.m., and a ten-minute break at 9 o’clock at night. During the short breaks they will be given water to drink and allowed to rest; during the fifteen and thirty minute breaks they will also get some food, preferably dry bread for the shorter break and bitch broth or cunt stew for the longer break, served either in dog bowls or (my personal preference!) in their potty. To prevent time-wasting by the girls they will have butt plugs securely fastened up their arse all day so that they won’t be able to take a shit. If they want to piss they’ll have to ask one of the male guards or work supervisors for permission and they’ll have to piss into their potty in full view of him! And of course every time they ask to take a piss he has the right to punish the girl for wasting his time with her trivial wishes! During the course of her working day a girl on hard labour can expect to get a fair bit of flogging at the hands of her overseers – and rightly so!

16                 Each day the girl will have her performance monitored by the supervisors or guards. They’ll assess how much work she carried out and check it off against the daily quota they’ve assigned her. If she doesn’t manage to meet her quota she’ll be punished but if she does it will be increased the next day until she can’t! Fair enough, innit?

17                 When the girl’s working day is over at last she’ll be taken back to the prison, made to take another shower and sent back to her cell to sleep. She won’t have anything like a bed, blankets, duvets or linen in her cell, only a hard wooden plank to lie on without any pillows for her to rest her head on. Before being allowed to go to sleep the butt plug will be taken out of her arse but she’ll be fitted with a chastity belt, not to protect her from the guards – she’ll never get any protection from them! – but to stop her going in for lezzy sex with other inmates or being able to frig herself off.  Of course the guards have a key to her belt so if they fancy unlocking it during the night they can come right in and fuck her before locking her up again!

18                 Her cell won’t have any natural light coming in, just a bare bulb that burns night and day. In winter no heating at all will be provided but in the summer the heating will be turned up to the maximum possible temperature. No chair, table or any sort of facilities will be in the cell which will just be bare whitewashed walls.

I reckon all that ought to make prisons for girls so unpleasant that it really will deter female crime!

Just my two pennyworth, anyway!

Reforming the rape laws

Reforming the rape laws

It’s obvious that the existing laws are totally biased towards feminist nonsense. The whole idea that so-called “husband rape,” “date rape” and “acquaintance rape” can be regarded as “crimes” is just plain stupid as well as obviously unjust. Equally it’s ridiculous to assume that a man could possibly be “guilty” of “raping” a prostitute. The mere fact that she IS a whore means she’s offering her body for sex and so it’s logically impossible to rape a whore!

It’s also obvious that police officers, prison guards, the military and other people in positions of authority can't  be guilty of “rape” if they have sex with a girl, even “against her will.” If the girl’s been arrested then she’s the property of the authorities unless she can prove her innocence. As property, she HAS no “right” to refuse sex to a gentleman and so it can't be rape!

 Even with “stranger rape,” which IMO is the ONLY type of “rape” that should remain a criminal offence, the way it’s treated ought to be completely different. Instead of being looked on as a crime of violence or forced sex, it should be reclassified as a crime against property similar to theft. Essentially, “stranger rape” involves using another man’s property without his consent, and only HE is an injured party as a result. A simple monetary payment to the girl’s legal owner is the appropriate way of dealing with that particular offence. No “harm” at all was done to the girl, only her owner.

Even in the case of “stranger rape,” the courts ought to begin from a presumption of the man’s innocence and NOT, as they do right now, of his guilt. The girl should not only be made to explain to the court exactly WHY she refused to let the gentleman have sex with her but should also be made to answer detailed and explicit questions about her sexual history. 

The court will assume, unless she can prove otherwise, that she CONSENTED to have sex with the “rapist” and was a willing, active and enthusiastic participant in CONSENSUAL sexual activity. The language she used, the way she was dressed and her general behaviour will all be considered relevant factors in any “stranger rape” case as well as her previous sexual history. And, of course, if the girl orgasmed while being “raped,” that’s enough in itself to PROVE that she DID consent to have sex with the gentleman. In law, an orgasm is proof of the girl’s CONSENT to having sex with the man and therefore it CAN’T have been rape!  

In terms of the standard of evidence needed to get a conviction for rape, the whole rules of law, evidence and court procedure need to be radically changed – not just in rape cases but perhaps especially in them. If it’s just the girl’s word against his then the court will automatically assume that she is deliberately lying so she’ll have to do better than that if she wants to take the gentlemen to trial. Actually if her only evidence is her word against the man’s then the police will refuse even to enter a charge and instead the girl will find herself being charged with a new offence that I’ll write about in a few paragraph’s time.

It’s important to remember that evidence that sexual activity took place WON’T be regarded in law as “evidence” of “rape.” To get a conviction in a rape case, the girl has to prove several things: that the man was a complete stranger to her; that he demanded sex with her and she refused; that the way she acted, dressed, or talked didn’t give him any reason to think that she WAS up for it; that she not only DIDN’T encourage him to have sex with her, but made it quite clear that she DIDN’T want him to fuck her; that she gave him a valid reason for not wanting to be fucked (I’ll write about what the valid reasons are in a minute); that she ISN’T a prostitute; and that she DIDN’T orgasm when she was being fucked.

Even if the girl is able to prove all those things, the court will still tend to believe that the gentleman is telling the truth rather than her unless she can either produce some sort of videotaped evidence or else sworn statements by male witnesses in support of her story. Witness statements by females won’t be considered admissible evidence. Only the testimony of male witnesses will be allowed by the court.  And there must be at least ten male witnesses to confirm the truth of the girl’s story.

Video or CCTV evidence will be closely examined to see if it has been tampered with.. DNA evidence or other “physical proof” of sexual activity won’t be allowed into evidence either since that will only show that the girl was fucked, not that she was raped and is therefore irrelevant as evidence.

Three new offences should also be created in this area of law, the first and most obvious being “false accusation.”  Any girl who accuses a gentleman of “rape” will automatically be assumed to be lying unless she can prove that she is not. The penalty for such a crime must be severe enough to deter future offenders.

A new offence of “incitement to rape” should be created so that a girl who dresses provocatively, talks dirty, flirts or otherwise give the impression that she IS willing to consent to sex and yet refuses will be found guilty of that crime.  Again, harsh penalties need to be imposed on girls who are found guilty of incitement to rape.

Another new offence of “refusal of sexual rights” should also be created so that girls who refuse to allow their husbands, partners, boyfriends or friends to fuck them will be found guilty of that crime. Again, they have to be punished for behaviour like that.

When processing girls who complain about “stranger rape”  the police should automatically arrest the girl on suspicion of making a false accusation, hold her in custody incommunicado and give her a thorough and vigorous interrogation for a week until she either changes her story or else the police decide there IS enough evidence to think that stranger rape MIGHT have been committed. If they do decide to proceed then at that point the girl will be released and the gentleman is brought in for questioning. Unlike the girl, he is allowed to have a lawyer present and may only be questioned for up to an hour before being released. If they believe he MIGHT be guilty they will contact the girl’s legal owner or guardian and inform him of the fact. Nine times out of ten the two gentlemen will agree on an out of court settlement where the Gentleman who “raped” the other’s property will pay him monetary compensation for theft or damage. If the girl’s owner accepts this settlement, that’s an end of the matter, unless the police feel that the girl was guilty of incitement to rape in which case she will be punished with the full force of the law. Obviously only HE has been injured by the other gentleman’s actions and no harm at all has been done to the girl!

Only if the girl’s owner decides that he wants to pursue the “rapist” can a prosecution take place. If his case is brought to trial then his identity must be strictly protected at all times. By contrast, the girl’s name, address, phone number, e-mail address, photograph, place of employment (if any) and all other personal details will be made freely available to the press and media and publicized. Even if he is found guilty by the court the maximum penalty under the law will be a fine and an order to pay monetary compensation to the girl’s owner or legal guardian.

               

How I'd like school to be like for girls

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xb648c_naked-school_sexy

Man the giver of life; woman the vessel that contains it

Man the giver of life; woman the vessel that contains it:On every level men show themselves to be our superiors. Us girls might retort that only we can have babies, but it's not actually true. Yes, only we can carry and deliver them, but  without the male sperm to fertilise our egss we'd stay barren. Even if our pregnancy comes  about through artificial insemination it's still the man's sperm that brings life into the  world and irrigates our barren wombs.

So man  is the bringer of life, the creator of life. A female is only a vessel that  houses the life he gives until the time comes to deliver his gift to the world. The role of a girl in conception is just lie back and enjoy it while the man does all the work - thrusting inside her, sending his tadpoles on their way. Even inside the body, most sperm die, because the journey up from the girl's cunt to her ovaries is such an epic struggle that only the strongest sperm survive.

Basically, we're just baby carriers, a sort of covered pram with flesh. Us girls are  incapable of creating life
 unless the man  does the hard work of fertilising our lazy eggs that just wait for him to appear!

I think this is the basic truth  behind the Bible story of Adam and Eve. Obvously women are not made out of an extra male rib, but we ARE secondary to men and can ONLY come into existence through HIS efforts and NOT through our own.

Because we ARE secondary, we are less important, less valuable even. Instead of saying  "women and children first," maybe we OUGHT to be saying "men and boys first."  In the great scale of human life, girls really don't MATTER that much. They've contributed  almost NOTHING to science, mathematics, music, paintings. sculpture and philosophy and very  LITTLE to literature. In politics their involvement has been disastrous.

We need to STOP trying to pretend we're as good or as important as men.

We need to ACCEPT that we ARE inferior and that without them we'd all still be living in  caves (if we hadn't all dies out altogether!)

Let's just be GRATEFUL to men for giving us the chance to house and deliver the gift of  life that only THEY bring into the world.

Thank you for your gift of life, Gentlemen!

My message board deleted by Proboards.

Well, after achieving the dizzy heights of eleven members my proboards forum was deleted today.

I've no idea why - there's just a message where my site was saying "this account has been suspended in accordance with rule 25a" which basically means they can bin your forum without even having to give any reason.

Dominance and abuse - a clarification

I've had some interesting feedback from the girl who inspired my previous post.

In the light of what she said I think I need to clarify my position.

I've said I think rape should be legalised.

That's something I've posted already here and on other sites and it's got me a fair bit of abuse.

Let's put it in context.

When I was 18 years old I WAS raped.

It was my fault; I was leading the man on, dressed like a slut and drunk.

What shook me rigid was that I CAME as a result of being raped.

I had an ORGASM when I was raped.

That profoundly changed my view of sexual relations.

I'll write more tomorrow but I have to go to bed now.