Reforming the rape laws
It’s obvious that the existing laws are totally biased towards feminist nonsense. The whole idea that so-called “husband rape,” “date rape” and “acquaintance rape” can be regarded as “crimes” is just plain stupid as well as obviously unjust. Equally it’s ridiculous to assume that a man could possibly be “guilty” of “raping” a prostitute. The mere fact that she IS a whore means she’s offering her body for sex and so it’s logically impossible to rape a whore!
It’s also obvious that police officers, prison guards, the military and other people in positions of authority can't be guilty of “rape” if they have sex with a girl, even “against her will.” If the girl’s been arrested then she’s the property of the authorities unless she can prove her innocence. As property, she HAS no “right” to refuse sex to a gentleman and so it can't be rape!
Even with “stranger rape,” which IMO is the ONLY type of “rape” that should remain a criminal offence, the way it’s treated ought to be completely different. Instead of being looked on as a crime of violence or forced sex, it should be reclassified as a crime against property similar to theft. Essentially, “stranger rape” involves using another man’s property without his consent, and only HE is an injured party as a result. A simple monetary payment to the girl’s legal owner is the appropriate way of dealing with that particular offence. No “harm” at all was done to the girl, only her owner.
Even in the case of “stranger rape,” the courts ought to begin from a presumption of the man’s innocence and NOT, as they do right now, of his guilt. The girl should not only be made to explain to the court exactly WHY she refused to let the gentleman have sex with her but should also be made to answer detailed and explicit questions about her sexual history.
The court will assume, unless she can prove otherwise, that she CONSENTED to have sex with the “rapist” and was a willing, active and enthusiastic participant in CONSENSUAL sexual activity. The language she used, the way she was dressed and her general behaviour will all be considered relevant factors in any “stranger rape” case as well as her previous sexual history. And, of course, if the girl orgasmed while being “raped,” that’s enough in itself to PROVE that she DID consent to have sex with the gentleman. In law, an orgasm is proof of the girl’s CONSENT to having sex with the man and therefore it CAN’T have been rape!
In terms of the standard of evidence needed to get a conviction for rape, the whole rules of law, evidence and court procedure need to be radically changed – not just in rape cases but perhaps especially in them. If it’s just the girl’s word against his then the court will automatically assume that she is deliberately lying so she’ll have to do better than that if she wants to take the gentlemen to trial. Actually if her only evidence is her word against the man’s then the police will refuse even to enter a charge and instead the girl will find herself being charged with a new offence that I’ll write about in a few paragraph’s time.
It’s important to remember that evidence that sexual activity took place WON’T be regarded in law as “evidence” of “rape.” To get a conviction in a rape case, the girl has to prove several things: that the man was a complete stranger to her; that he demanded sex with her and she refused; that the way she acted, dressed, or talked didn’t give him any reason to think that she WAS up for it; that she not only DIDN’T encourage him to have sex with her, but made it quite clear that she DIDN’T want him to fuck her; that she gave him a valid reason for not wanting to be fucked (I’ll write about what the valid reasons are in a minute); that she ISN’T a prostitute; and that she DIDN’T orgasm when she was being fucked.
Even if the girl is able to prove all those things, the court will still tend to believe that the gentleman is telling the truth rather than her unless she can either produce some sort of videotaped evidence or else sworn statements by male witnesses in support of her story. Witness statements by females won’t be considered admissible evidence. Only the testimony of male witnesses will be allowed by the court. And there must be at least ten male witnesses to confirm the truth of the girl’s story.
Video or CCTV evidence will be closely examined to see if it has been tampered with.. DNA evidence or other “physical proof” of sexual activity won’t be allowed into evidence either since that will only show that the girl was fucked, not that she was raped and is therefore irrelevant as evidence.
Three new offences should also be created in this area of law, the first and most obvious being “false accusation.” Any girl who accuses a gentleman of “rape” will automatically be assumed to be lying unless she can prove that she is not. The penalty for such a crime must be severe enough to deter future offenders.
A new offence of “incitement to rape” should be created so that a girl who dresses provocatively, talks dirty, flirts or otherwise give the impression that she IS willing to consent to sex and yet refuses will be found guilty of that crime. Again, harsh penalties need to be imposed on girls who are found guilty of incitement to rape.
Another new offence of “refusal of sexual rights” should also be created so that girls who refuse to allow their husbands, partners, boyfriends or friends to fuck them will be found guilty of that crime. Again, they have to be punished for behaviour like that.
When processing girls who complain about “stranger rape” the police should automatically arrest the girl on suspicion of making a false accusation, hold her in custody incommunicado and give her a thorough and vigorous interrogation for a week until she either changes her story or else the police decide there IS enough evidence to think that stranger rape MIGHT have been committed. If they do decide to proceed then at that point the girl will be released and the gentleman is brought in for questioning. Unlike the girl, he is allowed to have a lawyer present and may only be questioned for up to an hour before being released. If they believe he MIGHT be guilty they will contact the girl’s legal owner or guardian and inform him of the fact. Nine times out of ten the two gentlemen will agree on an out of court settlement where the Gentleman who “raped” the other’s property will pay him monetary compensation for theft or damage. If the girl’s owner accepts this settlement, that’s an end of the matter, unless the police feel that the girl was guilty of incitement to rape in which case she will be punished with the full force of the law. Obviously only HE has been injured by the other gentleman’s actions and no harm at all has been done to the girl!
Only if the girl’s owner decides that he wants to pursue the “rapist” can a prosecution take place. If his case is brought to trial then his identity must be strictly protected at all times. By contrast, the girl’s name, address, phone number, e-mail address, photograph, place of employment (if any) and all other personal details will be made freely available to the press and media and publicized. Even if he is found guilty by the court the maximum penalty under the law will be a fine and an order to pay monetary compensation to the girl’s owner or legal guardian.