My newest blog

Because I've often been asked about my life experiences I've decided to start a brand new blog where I'll write about them.

It's called 'Donna's Journey to Enlightenment' and the url is:

http://donnasjourneytoenlightnment.blogspot.co.uk/

It begins of course with my 'road to Damascus moment' - my rape at 18 years old and how it began to open my eyes to what I really was and what the proper relationship between men and women was.

Please check it out and comment!

I'll keep this blog going for my more philosophical posts on society and so on.

The culture of entitlement

Once upon a time us girls were happy to be taken care of by a man. He was the head of the household and what he said went. Then we got brainwashed by the feminists and suddenly we thought that we were as good as he was.

Before long they were even telling us that we were BETTER than him.

All our former DUTIES like being a good wife and mother went right out of the window.

Suddenly instead of having DUTIES we had RIGHTS.

OK, at first we went along with that but then rights turned into privileges and the next thing we know privileges had become ENTITLEMENTS.

Suddenly us girls were ENTITLED to every fucking thing we wanted and to hell with the guys if they dared to object or even question our demands.

Needs turned into wants and wants into whims, fads and in the end total self-centred indulgence.

Bad behaviour by girls became the norm; respect, consideration, duty, you name it all went down the pan faster than you could say 'whoa!'

One time us girls knew what our proper place in the world was.

Then the feminists started trying to make us all equal.

NOW it seems that just because we're female we need to be treated SPECIAL.

We are supposed to demand everything we want, keep on looking out for more things to demand and basically act like total self-centred spoilt brats.

Well, that's what the culture of entitlement means.

We're 'entitled' to anything we want just because we're female!

That's the sad state of things in the world these days.

The sooner we go back to doing what's RIGHT and to thinking about our DUTIES in the word rather than about our 'entitlements' the better place the world will be!

Legitimate rape?

A US politician running for the Senate has just got into trouble for saying that pregnancy doesn't result from 'legitimate rape.'

Of course he's been howled down by the feminists and disowned by almost everyone but if you go behind the rhetoric, the politics and the sloganising let's consider the FACTS.

In the first place what does he MEAN by a legitimate rape?

IS there such a thing?

Is ALL rape legitimate?

Are his facts CORRECT about the level of pregnancies resulting from rape?

I'll answer these questions not in the order I've posed them.

First off, I can't speak for American statistics (someone I know says that in the US the official figures for pregnancies resulting from rape are 4% but I find it hard to believe it's so low.

In Britain research has DEFINITELY shown that a girl is MORE likely to get pregnant if she's raped than if she has 'consensual sex.'

So actually if you look at it from the point of view of pure biology rape is a MORE efficient way of getting pregnant than consensual sex!

And the statistics are that pregnancy is MORE likely to come about through rape than through consensual sex!

So the guy's facts are wrong - probably obtained from some feminist source or something equally untrustworthy.

So let's get back to the biggie; what IS a legitimate rape?

Well, IMO the answer's pretty simple.

If a husband, partner, boyfriend or person in a similar relationship has sex with a girl even if it really IS 'against her will' then it ISN'T real rape.

If a girl is leading a guy on and refusing to put out and he gets frustrated and forces her then it ISN'T real rape.

So ''rape' under any of those circumstances just ISN'T any big deal and certainly NOT any kind of crime.

So what about 'stranger rape?' Is THAT a legitimate rape or not?

Well, the way I look at it, if a girl is going out on her own or doing anything without her owner then she knows that the expectation is going to be that she's at the very least looking for a good time if not a downright whore.

So if a girl goes out on her own and gets raped then IMO she deserves everything she got!

Whichever way I look at it I keep coming back to the same conclusion.

Rape is NOT a crime, CANNOT be a crime and SHOULD not be listed as a crime on the statute books.

ANY girl who gets raped has obviously ASKED for it and is only getting what she deserves.

End of1

Back in business!

Sorry for the long break. There has been illness in the family which has drastically taken up most of my time.

I hope to be posting more challenging articles in the near future.

In the meantime I'm just announcing that i'm back!

The unimportance of a woman's consent

The unimportance of a woman’s consent

I dealt with the question of consent in an earlier post but this time I want to go into it in a bit more detail and from several different angles.

There are several different ways in which consent can be interpreted but the main ones are active consent, where one or more parties deliberately pursue a course of action; tacit consent, where their failure to act implies consent; negative consent, where people complain but go along with it in spite of their objections; and implicit consent, where by doing or not doing something they are implying consent to an act.

As well as these areas, where consent is required to some extent, there’s also the question of the many situations where consent is not only not needed but is an irrelevant factor. How can a child consent or refuse to consent to anything meaningful?

Of course that doesn’t mean that kids don’t need protecting from predatory adults like paedophiles; that they don’t need to be tended and not neglected or abused; that they don’t have certain basic human rights that need to be respected.

What it does mean is that they can’t give an active, informed consent to pretty well anything and adults, especially family members, have to decide for them.

In the same way, criminals can’t be allowed to “consent” to their punishment any more than lunatics can “consent” to their medical treatment.

Nor can animals “consent” to being owned or object to their owners’ treatment of them.

I’m going to try and show how and why I think that females fall into the same category of a person whose consent is not necessary and is an irrelevant factor.

To begin with, it’s arguable whether us girls are even human beings at all. Men are; it’s not so clear with girls. If we’re not human then of course human rights don’t and can’t apply to us.

I’m not totally sure if we are human or not [http://bornwithacunt.blogspot.com/2011/06/are-women-human.html]. From a purely personal point of view I hope we are but I’m not sure.

What is certain is that we’re genetically inferior to men. Women are closer to the apes than men are. The male is a higher, more evolved species than the female. [http://bornwithacunt.blogspot.com/2011/05/girls-closer-to-apes-than-men-are.html]

So, at the very least, us girls are less human than men.

That means that we’re less capable of giving our “consent” to anything than men are and that our “consent” or non-consent is at least less important than a man’s consent, if not an entirely irrelevant issue.

Secondly, as well as being genetically inferior to men, we’re also less intelligent than they are. Our brains are smaller than men’s; they process information differently; and we have far less ability to reason, think abstractly and deal with shapes and numbers.

The bottom line is we’re more stupid than men.

Again, our innate stupidity makes the question of our “consent” less important and a factor that can, quite reasonably, be ignored completely if necessary.

Another aspect of the way our smaller brains work is that we’re more emotional than men and so we find it harder to think rationally and tend just to follow our whims and feelings.

Another way we fall down in comparison with men is how we react in a crisis. Women tend to freeze and panic while men think and act to get out of a dangerous situation.

All these facts make the question of a woman’s “consent” far less important than a man’s consent. He consents with open eyes, in full knowledge of the facts and more or less understanding the consequences of his actions. Women tend to drift on a sea of uninformed emotion and indecisiveness.

So let’s recap briefly:

1                     Women may not even be human at all

2                     Even if they are, science tells us they’re a lower form of humanity than men are

3                     Women are less capable of giving consent because of their closer relationship to animals

4                     Women are more stupid than men and therefore less capable of giving consent

5                     Women are less rational than men and therefore less capable of giving consent

6                     Women are more emotional than men and therefore less capable of giving consent

7                     Women freeze in a crisis which makes them less capable of giving consent

When you put all these factors together, it’s difficult not to feel that women don’t even know what they’re doing half the time, why they’re doing it and how they really think/feel about it.

The bottom line is, a woman’s “consent” is just not relevant. It’s nice if she does consent but her “consent” just isn’t necessary or even important and can quite reasonably be ignored.

As a logo I saw on the web said, “Our Will Does Not Matter.”

Welfare sluts

Welfare sluts

One of the biggest problems we've got in society is the amount of money we're wasting on paying so-called single mothers millions in benefits.

Why?

Because they got pregnant and couldn't be bothered to do the decent thing and marry the bloke?

Well, the way I see it, you've got to take the consequences of what you do in life. If you're going to go around having it off and you're up the duff as a result, well, I'd say that's YOUR problem.

Why should WE have to pick up the tab for a bunch of slappers?

And look at all the goodies they get given to them on a plate - free council homes, housing benefit, "lone parent" benefit, family allowance, free teeth, free pretty well everything! Those "single mums" are nothing but a bunch of freeloaders!

Well, it's high time this particular gravy train got run right into the buffers!

If a bloke goes with a prostitute and has it off with her she isn't going to come on to him for money if she winds up with a bun in the oven!

So why should WE be expected to fork out OUR hard-earned dosh so that a bunch of part-time whores can live high on the hog on OUR money just because they couldn't keep their legs closed?

These girls aren't "single mums" or "lone parents;" they're welfare sluts getting paid by the taxpayer for having it off!

So how can we get rid of the problem of these welfare sluts?

The first thing to do is to stop REWARDING the whores for opening their legs and start PUNISHING them for it!

Here's my five-point plan for getting rid of the problem of welfare sluts for GOOD.

1    Take away their council homes
2    Take away their housing benefit
3    Take away their "lone parent" benefit and family allowance
4    Take away their bastard kids and put them up for adoption with MARRIED couples
5    Send the lazy slags out to do a PROPER day's work!

If we do all that then these welfare sluts will disappear overnight..



And a good thing too!

The how and why of what I am

Since I started my blog I've had a lot of reaction to it. Some haven't responded directly and instead have made nasty comments - generally anonymously - on other sites putting out lies about me and about my blog.

Both men and women have liked some, most or even all of what I've said. Both men and women have disliked some, most or even all of what I've said.

Those who disagree with me tend to take three main points of view. The most common "anti" reaction is to assume that I'm writing satire and don't believe a word of what I say. The second most common "anti" reaction is to claim I'm really a man pretending to be a woman. The third "anti" reaction is to assume that I'm a mentally ill self-hating woman.

I can understand the argument that I'm writing satire. It's actually PARTLY true. I DO have a sense of humour; I DO enjoy winding people up; I DO like playing devil's advocate; I DO enjoy satire; and I can also deliberately use "shock jock" tactics to make a point.

Sometimes I'll push an argument to its extremes and see where it takes me..

At times, especially lately, I've looked back on some of the more outrageous posts I've made in the past and wished that maybe I'd expressed myself in a less sensationalist way.

Some of the things I said werre more like provocative debating points than necessarily meant literally.

And, of course, like most people, when it comes to the crunch I'd want my own family and my own situation NOT to be as extreme as some of the ideas I put forward.

I'm a writer of stories as well and I guess the boundarires between my vivid imagination and reality sometimes get a bit blurred in my mind.

All of those things are true about me and need to be remembered when you're reading my posts.

That DOESN'T mean I'm being insincere.

I won't waste any time responding to the nonsense about me being a bloke. Faye Kane gets the same lie hurled at her and it's just as much crap in my case as it is in hers.

For the record, I DON'T have a cock and balls; I've got tits and a cunt and I've given birth to three kids!

Now for the idea that I'm a loony tune self-hating woman.

Sometimes I've even wondered myself if that COULD be true.

The thing is, I DID get raped when I was 18 years old. Some people think it fucked me up for the rest of my life and scrambled my brain so I can't think straight.

Well, in quite a few ways it DID and maybe even still DOES.

On the other hand, my rape was ALSO a moment of pretty profound illumination for me.

You could almost call it a mystical experience.

It was my "road to Damascus" moment.

I had the BEST fucking orgasm of my life when I was being raped!

When I WAS raped, even as it was happening I suddenly realised several things - about me, about the bloke who'd raped me, and about what it meant for my life.

I'll try and keep it short because this post is already too long.

In the first place I realised it was MY fault that I'd got raped. I was drunk, dressed like a slut, talking dirty and deliberately leading the guy on. Basically I was behaving like a bully towards him and I only got what I DESERVED for the appallling way I treated him,

I also realised that because I'd had an ORGASM while I was being raped that meant that really I HAD consented to the "rape."

What I had that mystical day was NOT some horrific violent assault upon me; it was an entirely CONSENSUAL sexual act.

The very fact that I orgasmed PROVED that I'd CONSENTED to having sex!

I didn't suddenly turn overnight into the woman I am today but as a result of what I NOW see through the mists of time (nearly 13 years later) as being an act of KINDNESS towards me.

My "rape" - actually my CONSENSUAL "rough sex" - began to open my eyes to a new way of looking at the world.

Since that day other men have helped me towards the truth, particularly my wonderful husband and a number of men I've met online.

But if it hadn't been for that act of kindness towards me all those years ago I might STILL be the spoilt, arrogant feminist bitch I was at 18.

It sounds corny but this is NOT a piece of satire; NOT a piece of self-hatred.

It comes from the heart and is utterly sincere.

"Thank you, Mr Rapist, for the kindness you showed me all those years ago,"